Laney v. Prudden et al

Filing 25

ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners Second Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Rule 12(c), F.R.CIV.P. is DENIED. 13 Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 3/7/12. (CLA)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION

JAMES H. LANEY,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner,
vs.
DOUG PRUDDEN, et al.,
Respondent(s).

Case No. 4:10CV2119 JCH

ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s Second Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
Pursuant to Rule 12(c), F.R.CIV.P., filed on March 31, 2011. (ECF No. 13). The basis of
Petitioner’s motion is Respondents’ purported failure to file a timely response to the Court’s Order
of January 27, 2011, which directed Respondents to show cause why the relief requested by
Petitioner should not be granted. (ECF No. 13, ¶¶ 3-5). On April 7, 2011, the Court granted
Respondents’ request for an extension of time to file a response. (ECF No. 15). Respondents filed
their response on April 26, 2011. (ECF No. 17).
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Second Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
Pursuant to Rule 12(c), F.R.CIV.P. is DENIED.
Dated this 7th day of March, 2012.

/s/Jean C. Hamilton
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE