Bates v. County of Saint Charles et al

Filing 18

ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m), Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the defendants named above for lack of timely service. Show Cause Response due by 8/30/2011. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 8/16/11. (CLA)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION

DONALD BATES,
Plaintiff,
vs.
COUNTY OF ST. CHARLES, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:11CV00409 JCH

ORDER
Upon review of the record, the Court notes that the file contains no proof of service upon nor
entry of appearance on behalf of Defendants JOHN/JANE DOE WARD, JOHN/JANE DOE
ARMSTEAD, JOHN/JANE DOE POWELL, JOHN/JANE DOE TITTLE, JOHN/JANE DOE
NOSER, JOHN/JANE DOE SMITH, JOHN/JANE DOE DELAUM, JOHN/JANE DOE
WARNER, JOHN/JANE DOE RICKER, JOHN/JANE DOE SNEE, JOHN/JANE DOE
LYLES, JOHN/JANE DOE SCHROEDER, JOHN/JANE DOE WILLIAMS, JOHN/JANE
DOE NANSEL, JOHN/JANE DOE TUBBINS, JOHN/JANE DOE PEREZ, JOHN/JANE DOE
SCHNUR, JOHN/JANE DOE BRESSIE, JOHN/JANE DOE WILLIS, JOHN/JANE DOE
ROBINSON, JOHN/JANE DOE ALLEN, JOHN/JANE DOE AIKINS, JOHN/JANE DOE
BRAZEL, JOHN/JANE DOE PATTON , JOHN/JANE DOE KEPPLE, JOHN/JANE DOE
BRAXTON, JOHN/JANE DOE PEARIRA , JOHN/JANE DOE JONES, JOHN/JANE DOE
MCMEANANY, JOHN/JANE DOE CROSBY, JOHN/JANE DOE GONZALES, JOHN/JANE
DOE ACKIGOZ, JOHN/JANE DOE REMY, JOHN/JANE DOE REYNOLDS, JOHN/JANE
DOE EASTMAN, JOHN/JANE DOE BLANKENSHIP, JOHN/JANE DOE BUCKLES,
JOHN/JANE DOE COPLELAND, JOHN/JANE DOE MCFARLAND, JOHN/JANE DOE

LADD, JOHN/JANE DOE MARSDEN, JOHN/JANE DOE GLOVER, JOHN/JANE DOE
SHANKS, JOHN/JANE DOE MORRIS, JOHN/JANE DOE FRANKLIN, JOHN/JANE DOE
WALLACE, JOHN/JANE DOE DEMPSEY, JOHN/JANE DOE MCCORMICK,
JOHN/JANE DOE MCGUIRE, JOHN/JANE DOE EADS, JOHN/JANE DOE SITTON,
JOHN/JANE DOE SMITH, JOHN/JANE DOE IKE, JOHN/JANE DOE ZIKA, JOHN/JANE
DOE ARMSTRONG, JOHN/JANE DOE COYLE, JOHN/JANE DOE PINKUS, JOHN/JANE
DOE 1, JOHN/JANE DOE 2, JOHN/JANE DOE 3, JOHN/JANE DOE 4, or JOHN/JANE
DOE 5. Because it does not appear that service of the complaint has been made timely, within 120
days after the filing of the complaint on March 4, 2011,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m), Plaintiff shall show cause
in writing, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed
without prejudice as to the defendants named above for lack of timely service.

Dated this 16th day of August, 2011.

/s/Jean C. Hamilton
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-