Bradley v. St. Louis City Municipal Court

Filing 4

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 2 ORDERED that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's etition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is DISMISSED.. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 7/20/11. (CEL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CORY BRADLEY, Petitioner, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURTS, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:11CV1143 TIA MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner seeks to overturn two 2002 municipal court convictions for “leaving the scene of an accident” and “operating a vehicle without a license.” Petitioner is imprisoned at the Forrest City Medium Federal Correctional Institution in Forrest City, Arkansas, and it appears that he is currently serving a federal sentence for charges unrelated to said conviction. District courts have jurisdiction to entertain petitions for habeas relief only from persons who are “in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3) (emphasis added). The custody requirement is fulfilled when a petitioner is in custody “under the conviction or sentence under attack at the time his petition is filed.” Maleng v. Cook, 490 U.S. 488, 490-91 (1989). Petitioner is not currently in custody under the conviction he wishes to attack. As a result, petitioner is not “in custody” for the purposes of § 2241(c)(3), and the Court lacks jurisdiction to grant relief. The Court will, therefore, dismiss the petition without further proceedings. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3); Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED. Dated this 20th day of July, 2011. /s Jean C. Hamilton JEAN C. HAMILTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?