Davis v. Social Security Administration

Filing 15

ORDER--HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 14 ) is adopted and incorporated herein. FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this matter is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation and with this Order. A separate Order of Remand shall accompany this Order. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 09/05/2012. (CLK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION VAUGHN DAVIS, Plaintiff(s), vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:11CV1161 JCH (FRB) ORDER This matter arises on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles, filed August 17, 2012. (ECF No. 14). See 28 U.S.C. § 636. In his report, Magistrate Judge Buckles recommends that the Court reverse the decision of the Commissioner and remand this case for further proceedings. Neither party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. After review of the entire record in this matter, the Court concurs in the Magistrate Judge’s findings and will adopt the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 14) is adopted and incorporated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this matter is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and with this Order. A separate Order of Remand shall accompany this Order. Dated this 5th day of September, 2012. /s/ Jean C. Hamilton UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?