Etenburn v. Norman
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 25 MOTION for Reconsideration re 23 Memorandum & Order,, 24 Judgment - (Case), filed by Petitioner Charles S. Etenburn motion is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 8/17/12. (LGK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
CHARLES S. ETENBURN,
Cause No. 4:11 CV 1181 RWS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration [#25].
Petitioner argues that the Court erred in denying his application for writ of habeas corpus.
“Motions for reconsideration serve a limited function: to correct manifest errors of law or
fact or to present newly discovered evidence.” Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp., 839 F.2d 407,
414 (8th Cir.1988) (quoting Rothwell Cotton Co. v. Rosenthal & Co., 827 F.2d 246, 251 (7th
Cir.), as amended, 835 F.2d 710 (7th Cir.1987)).
Petitioner’s motion merely reasserts his arguments from his Section 2254 petition.
Petitioner does not assert manifest errors of law or fact and does not present newly discovered
evidence. As a result, his motion will be denied.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration [#25] is
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 17th day of August, 2012.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?