Anheuser Busch, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Comapany of Pittsburgh, Pa.

Filing 92

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that consistent with the Court's conference with counsel, National Union's Motion for Protective Order 89 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 11/20/12. (ARL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ANHEUSER BUSCH, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE ) COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, ) ) Defendants. ) No. 4:11-CV-1220-JAR MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Following a telephone conference with counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that consistent with the Court’s conference with counsel, National Union’s Motion for Protective Order [89] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: The deposition of Megan Watt will proceed on December 12, 2012 with the understanding that the scope of Ms. Watt’s deposition will be limited in scope to non-privileged information related to the retained limits policy provision. The depositions of Jeffrey Goldwater and Carol Johnson shall take place no later than November 30, 2012, with the understanding that the scope of these depositions will be limited to non-privileged information related to the retained limits policy provision.. The deposition of Meredith Levy will also proceed with the understanding that the scope of Ms. Levy’s deposition will be limited to non-privileged information related to the retained limits policy provision. A-B indicated that at this time it is withdrawing the deposition notices for Wayne Zlotshewer, John Schumacher and John Mohs. Finally, National Union shall identify and produce witnesses subject to A-B’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notices no later than December 14, 2012. Dated this 20th day of November, 2012. _______________________________ JOHN A. ROSS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?