Chavis Van & Storage of Myrtle Beach, Inc. et al v. United Van Lines, LLC et al

Filing 84

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re Plaintiffs' motion to compel 81 DENIED, with exceptions. Please see Memorandum and Order for full details. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 4/2/13. (ARL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CHAVIS VAN & STORAGE OF MYRTLE BEACH, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED VAN LINES, LLC, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:11CV1299 RWS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER After careful consideration of plaintiffs’ motion to compel and defendants’ response, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion to compel [#81] is denied, except defendants shall provide the information they agreed to produce in their opposition brief, which includes the following: defendants shall provide plaintiffs with a verified report regarding the metadata associated with the relevant portion of the Board minutes (page 5 of their response); and, defendants shall supplement their responses to plaintiffs’ Requests for Production Numbers 5 and 7 to state that after a diligent search, they are unaware of any additional responsive, nonprivileged documents. Such supplement shall be provided to plaintiffs within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. In all other respects (including plaintiffs’ request to depose defendant United’s CEO), the motion to compel is DENIED. RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 2nd day of April, 2013.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?