Chavis Van & Storage of Myrtle Beach, Inc. et al v. United Van Lines, LLC et al

Filing 84

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re Plaintiffs' motion to compel 81 DENIED, with exceptions. Please see Memorandum and Order for full details. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 4/2/13. (ARL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
CHAVIS VAN & STORAGE OF
MYRTLE BEACH, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
UNITED VAN LINES, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:11CV1299 RWS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
After careful consideration of plaintiffs’ motion to compel and defendants’ response,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion to compel [#81] is denied, except
defendants shall provide the information they agreed to produce in their opposition brief, which
includes the following: defendants shall provide plaintiffs with a verified report regarding the
metadata associated with the relevant portion of the Board minutes (page 5 of their response);
and, defendants shall supplement their responses to plaintiffs’ Requests for Production Numbers
5 and 7 to state that after a diligent search, they are unaware of any additional responsive, nonprivileged documents. Such supplement shall be provided to plaintiffs within ten (10) days of
the date of this Order. In all other respects (including plaintiffs’ request to depose defendant
United’s CEO), the motion to compel is DENIED.

RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 2nd day of April, 2013.