Riley v. Social Security Administration

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein. (Doc. No. 20). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 8/29/2012. (KSM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION KHRISTINE RILEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:11-CV-1535-AGF/NAB MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker to whom this matter was referred for recommended disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On August 14, 2012, Magistrate Judge Baker filed her recommendation that the Court deny Plaintiff’s request for reversal of the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits. Neither party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. Upon careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case, the Court concurs with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge finding that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the Commissioner’s decision that Plaintiff is not disabled. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein. (Doc. No. 20.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. AUDREY G. FLEISSIG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 29th day of August, 2012. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?