Rice v. Unitrin Data Systems

Filing 59

OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No. 57 ] is granted.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is dismissed. Case Closed. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 07/22/2014. (CLK)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
AMIE RICE,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITRIN DATA SYSTEM,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:11CV1702 HEA

OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No.
57]. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion. For the reasons set forth in the
motion and below, the Motion is granted.
On March 9, 2012, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Stay Action
and Compel Arbitration. On October 16, 2012, Plaintiff filed an Amended
Demand for Arbitration which specifically incorporated the Complaint filed in this
action into AAA Arbitration Case No. 58 160 00204 12, which had been
previously initiated by Defendant.
Defendant advises the Court that the parties engaged in final, binding
arbitration on March 3-5, 2014. On May 16, 2014, the Arbitrator in this matter
issued an Opinion and Award. Defendant further advises the Court that the
Opinion and Award resolves all matters raised by Plaintiff in her Complaint and

Amended Demand for Arbitration. Plaintiff has filed nothing to controvert
Defendant’s representations.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, [Doc.
No. 57] is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is dismissed.
Dated this 22nd day of July, 2014.

_______________________________
HENRY EDWARD AUTREY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE