Rice v. Unitrin Data Systems

Filing 59

OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No. 57 ] is granted.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is dismissed. Case Closed. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 07/22/2014. (CLK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION AMIE RICE, Plaintiff, v. UNITRIN DATA SYSTEM, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:11CV1702 HEA OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No. 57]. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion. For the reasons set forth in the motion and below, the Motion is granted. On March 9, 2012, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Stay Action and Compel Arbitration. On October 16, 2012, Plaintiff filed an Amended Demand for Arbitration which specifically incorporated the Complaint filed in this action into AAA Arbitration Case No. 58 160 00204 12, which had been previously initiated by Defendant. Defendant advises the Court that the parties engaged in final, binding arbitration on March 3-5, 2014. On May 16, 2014, the Arbitrator in this matter issued an Opinion and Award. Defendant further advises the Court that the Opinion and Award resolves all matters raised by Plaintiff in her Complaint and Amended Demand for Arbitration. Plaintiff has filed nothing to controvert Defendant’s representations. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No. 57] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is dismissed. Dated this 22nd day of July, 2014. _______________________________ HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?