Kroeger v. Astrue

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff Amanda R. Kroeger's application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff Amanda R. Kroeger's Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 2/20/13. (KXS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION AMANDA R. KROEGER, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:11CV1862 ERW MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III [ECF No. 14] pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 636(b). The Court notes that no objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation within the time period afforded by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation and hereby sustains, adopts and incorporates herein the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The Social Security Commissioner’s decision to deny benefits will be affirmed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff Amanda R. Kroeger’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff Amanda R. Kroeger’s Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED with prejudice. Dated this 20th day of February, 2013. E. RICHARD WEBBER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?