Manning v. Michael Bowersox
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability [#22] is denied. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 3/27/15. (JWD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
ARTHUR LEE MANNING,
Petitioner,
vs.
)
MICHAEL BOWERSOX,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:11CV2060 RWS
)
)
)
)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on petitioner’s motion for certificate of
appealability. I denied petitioner a certificate of appealability on March 19, 2015,
when I denied his habeas petition. As petitioner’s motion raises no new
arguments that convince me my prior decision was in error, the motion will be
denied. As I stated before, to grant a certificate of appealability, the Court must
find a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. See
Tiedeman v. Benson, 122 F.3d 518, 522 (8th Cir. 1997). A substantial showing is
a showing that issues are debatable among reasonable jurists, a court could resolve
the issues differently, or the issues deserve further proceedings. Cox v. Norris,
133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997) (citing Flieger v. Delo, 16 F.3d 878, 882-83 (8th
- 1 -
Cir. 1994)). Because petitioner has not made such a showing, I will not issue a
certificate of appealability.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for a certificate of
appealability [#22] is denied.
__________________________________
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 27th day of March, 2015.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?