Hubbard v. St. Louis Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 41 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Add Additional Party and Motion for Jury Trial 41 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss 27 and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 35 directed at the prior complaint are DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 7/25/12. (LAH)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
MYRON HUBBARD,
Plaintiff,
v.
ST. LOUIS PSYCHIATRIC
REHABILITATION CENTER, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 4:11-CV-2082-JAR
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Amended
Complaint, Add Additional Party and Motion for Jury Trial [ECF No. 41]. Because Plaintiff has
not identified an additional party defendant in his proposed amended complaint, and because this
case is already docketed as a jury trial, the motion will be granted in part.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Amended
Complaint [41] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Add Additional Party and
Motion for Jury Trial [41] is DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [27] and Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss [35] directed at the prior complaint are DENIED as moot.
Dated the 25th day of July, 2012.
_______________________________
JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?