Wegmann v. Social Security Administration

Filing 22

ORDER for 21 : Upon careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 21 is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Judgment will accompany this Order. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/17/13. (ARL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION

JERRI WEGMAN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:11CV2185 JAR

ORDER
This matter arises on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
David D. Noce, filed December 27, 2012. See 28 U.S.C. §636. In his report, Magistrate Judge Noce
recommends that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss Plaintiff’s
Complaint with prejudice. Plaintiff was granted fourteen (14) days to object to the recommendation,
but to date has filed no objections.
Upon careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge [21] is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, AND INCORPORATED herein.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and
Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Judgment will accompany this
Order.
Dated this 17th day of January, 2013.

JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE