Carter v. Astrue
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Adelman is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. The Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny Supplemental Security Income benefits to Plaintiff is affirmed. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 3/5/13. (ARL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
DANIEL W. CARTER,
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Cause No. 4:12 CV 178 RWS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before me on a Report and Recommendation to affirm the decision of the
Commissioner of Social Security to deny Plaintiff Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of
the Social Security Act and Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security
Act. Neither of the parties has filed an objection to this recommendation.
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman for a Report
and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Judge Adelman issued a Report and
Recommendation on January 31, 2013 that recommended that the Commissioner’s decision to
deny benefits should be affirmed. Judge Adelman found that the Administrative Law Judge’s
determination that Plaintiff was not entitled to benefits was supported by substantial evidence in
Any objections to Judge Adelman’s Report and Recommendation had to be filed by
February 14, 2013. Neither of the parties has filed an objection as of today’s date.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge Adelman is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. The
Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny Supplemental Security Income benefits to
Plaintiff is affirmed.
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 5th day of March, 2013.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?