Irving v. Culton et al

Filing 112

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Because the plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this cause, and in an abundance of caution, this Court will grant plaintiff additional time, to and including October 15, 2013, by which to file any memorandum in opposition to defendant Cofer's Motion for Summary Judgment. If no memorandum in opposition is filed by that date, the Court will proceed to take up and rule the motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles on 9/24/13. (KXS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
WILLIAM E. IRVING,
Plaintiff,
v.
KEVIN CULTON, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No.

4:12CV183 FRB

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
On July 24, 2013, defendant Heather Cofer filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment on the claims made in plaintiff’s
Amended

Complaint,

(Docket

Nos.

110

with
and

Memorandum

111).

and

Plaintiff

Exhibits
has

not

in

Support

filed

any

memorandum in opposition to defendant Cofer’s Motion for Summary
Judgment and the time for doing so has passed.

See Local Rule

4.01(B), Eastern District of Missouri (a party opposing a motion
for summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 shall file a
memorandum and any appropriate documentary evidence twenty-one
(21) days after being served with the motion).
Because the plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this
cause, and in an abundance of caution, this Court will grant
plaintiff additional time, to and including October 15, 2013, by
which to file any memorandum in opposition to defendant Cofer’s
Motion for Summary Judgment.

If no memorandum in opposition is

filed by that date, the Court will proceed to take up and rule

the motion.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated this

24th

day of September, 2013.

-2-