Campbell v. Credit Protection Association, L.P.

Filing 28

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (Doc. No. 26.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, not later than February 7, 2013, Plaintiff shall file the additional materials she refer ences in her motion together with a brief (i)explaining why she believes the Court should consider those additional materials and (ii) addressing any arguments on the merits with respect to the effect of those materials on Defendants pending motion f or summary judgment. Plaintiff is advised that this Order should not be construed as a reopening of discovery in the case. The Court is satisfied that Plaintiff had a full and fair opportunity to conduct discovery in this case before she filed her mo tion for summary judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file, not later than February 21, 2013, a responsive brief addressing the same matters, and advising the Court whether Defendant requires any additional discovery in order to fully address the new materials.(Response to Court due by 2/7/2013.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 1/31/2013. (KSM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION

SHARON E. CAMPBELL,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
vs.
CREDIT PROTECTION
ASSOCIATION, L.P.,
Defendant.

Case No. 4:12CV00289AGF

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion to stay the Court’s ruling on
the pending summary judgment motions and to permit Plaintiff to conduct further
discovery. Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s motion and Defendant’s response thereto,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED in part and
DENIED in part. (Doc. No. 26.)
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, not later than February 7, 2013, Plaintiff shall
file the additional materials she references in her motion together with a brief (i)
explaining why she believes the Court should consider those additional materials and (ii)
addressing any arguments on the merits with respect to the effect of those materials on
Defendant’s pending motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff is advised that this Order
should not be construed as a reopening of discovery in the case. The Court is satisfied
that Plaintiff had a full and fair opportunity to conduct discovery in this case before she
filed her motion for summary judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file, not later than February
21, 2013, a responsive brief addressing the same matters, and advising the Court whether
Defendant requires any additional discovery in order to fully address the new materials.

AUDREY G. FLEISSIG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 31st day of January, 2013.