Scott et al v. Forest Laboratories, Inc. et al
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Plaintiffs Motion to Remand ECF No. 14 is GRANTED, and this case is remanded to the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, State of Missouri. An appropriate Order of Remand will accompany this Order. Signed by Honorable John A. Ross on 5/8/2012. (RAK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
LEAH SCOTT, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FOREST LABORATORIES, INC., and
FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 4:12-CV-320-JAR
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1447(c) [ECF No. 14]. The motion is unopposed and will be granted.
Plaintiffs filed this products liability action against Forest Laboratories, a New York
corporation, and Forest Pharmaceuticals, a Missouri corporation, in the St. Louis City Circuit
Court, 22nd Judicial Circuit, Case No. 1222-CC00857, on February 16, 2012. Defendant Forest
Laboratories removed the action to this Court 5 days later, on February 21, 2012, on the basis of
diversity jurisdiction.1 On March 21, 2012, Plaintiffs filed their Motion to Remand. Defendant
Forest Laboratories, Inc. has withdrawn its opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion [ECF No. 23].
28 U.S.C. § 1441(b) limits removal of actions based on diversity of citizenship when a
defendant is a citizen of the forum state.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand [ECF No. 14] is
1
As of the date of removal, the resident defendant, Forest Pharmaceuticals, had not been
served with the complaint or a summons.
GRANTED, and this case is remanded to the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, State of
Missouri. An appropriate Order of Remand will accompany this Order.
Dated this 8th day of May, 2012.
JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?