White et al v. 14051 Manchester, Inc. et al
Filing
200
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 199 MOTION to Quash Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Thelma White motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART...SEE ORDER... Jury Trial set for 5/5/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 12N before District Judge John A. Ross., Pretrial Conference set for 5/1/2014 01:30 PM in Chambers before District Judge John A. Ross., Response to Court due by 1/24/2014. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DEADLINES AND DETAILS.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/23/13. (LGK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
)
)
THELMA WHITE and NICOLE CARROLL, )
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
14051 MANCHESTER, INC. d/b/a
)
HOTSHOTS SPORTS
)
)
Defendants.
)
No. 4:12-CV-469 JAR
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum
and Memorandum in Support (ECF No. 199).
On December 20, 2013, the Court held a
telephone conference with counsel regarding this motion, and the Court ruled as follows.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum
and Memorandum in Support [199] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part.
The
document request, Attachment A to the Second Amended Notice of Deposition directed to
Joseph M. Fuchs III, is quashed, except with respect to item #6. That is, the Court orders that
Mr. Fuchs shall bring to his deposition “[e]ach and every communication between you and any
other Hotshots employee or representative relating to tip sharing,” but the document request is
quashed in all other respects.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall have until January 24, 2014 to
supplement their Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Class Missouri and
Illinois State Law Claims as a Class Action (ECF No. 161) pursuant to the testimony of Mr.
Fuchs.1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall have until January 31, 2014 to
supplement their Motion to Certify Missouri and Illinois State Claims as a Class Action (ECF
No. 138) pursuant to the testimony of Mr. Fuchs.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that this action is set for a JURY trial on May 5, 2014, at
9:00 a.m. This is a 2 week docket, and the parties are expected to be ready and available for
trial on the first day of the docket and thereafter on twenty-four hours notice.
In this case, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the attorneys shall, not less than
twenty (20) days prior to the date set for trial:
1.
Stipulation: Meet and jointly prepare and file with the Clerk a JOINT Stipulation
of all uncontested facts, which may be read into evidence subject to any objections of any party
set forth in said stipulation (including a brief summary of the case which may be used on Voir
Dire).
2.
Witnesses:
(a)
Deliver to opposing counsel, and to the Clerk, a list of all proposed
witnesses, identifying those witnesses who will be called to testify and those who may be called.
(b)
Except for good cause shown, no party will be permitted to call any
witnesses not listed in compliance with this Order.
3.
1
Exhibits:
Plaintiffs filed the affidavit of Mr. Fuchs in support of their Motion to Certify Class. See ECF
No. 140-61.
(a)
Mark for identification all exhibits to be offered in evidence at the trial
(Plaintiffs to use Arabic numerals and defendants to use letters, e.g., Pltf-1, Deft.-A, or Pltf
Jones-1, Deft Smith-A, if there is more than one plaintiff or defendant), and deliver to opposing
counsel and to the Clerk a list of such exhibits, identifying those that will be introduced into
evidence and those that may be introduced. The list shall clearly indicate for each business
record whether the proponent seeks to authenticate the business record by affidavit or declaration
pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 902(11) or 902(12).
(b)
Submit said exhibits or true copies thereof, and copies of all affidavits or
declarations pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 902(11)or 902(12), to opposing counsel for examination.
Prior to trial, the parties shall stipulate which exhibits may be introduced without objection or
preliminary identification, and shall file written objections to all other exhibits.
(c)
Except for good cause shown, no party will be permitted to offer any
exhibits not identified or not submitted by said party for examination by opposing counsel in
compliance with this Order. Any objections not made in writing by the time of the final pretrial
conference may be considered waived.
4.
Depositions, Interrogatory Answers, and Request for Admissions:
(a)
Deliver to opposing counsel and to the Clerk a list of all interrogatory
answers or parts thereof and depositions or parts thereof (identified by page and line numbers),
and answers to requests for admissions proposed to be offered in evidence. Before the time of
the final pretrial conference, opposing counsel shall state in writing any objections to such
testimony and shall identify any additional portions of such depositions not listed by the offering
party which opposing counsel proposes to offer.
(b)
Except for good cause shown, no party will be permitted to offer any
interrogatory answer, or deposition or part thereof, or answer to a request for admissions not
listed in compliance with this Order. Any objections not made as above required may be
considered waived.
5.
Motions in Limine: Parties shall file all motions in limine to exclude evidence at
least ten (10) days before the pretrial conference.
6.
Final Pretrial Conference: A final pretrial conference is set for May 1, 2014 at
1:30 p.m. in the chambers of the undersigned. Before the final pretrial conference, each party
shall submit to the Court and to opposing counsel his/her/its written request for instructions and
forms of verdicts reserving the right to submit requests for additional or modified instructions in
light of the opposing party=s requests for instructions. (Each request must be supported by at
least one pertinent citation.)
Dated this 23rd day of December, 2013.
_________________________________
JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?