Turner v. Mull et al

Filing 32

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to amend 31 is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 8/21/12. (LAH)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
TERRY M. TURNER,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
UNKNOWN MULL, et al.,
Defendants.

No. 4:12CV561 JAR

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint by interlineation
(ECF NO. 31). The Court does not accept amendments by interlineation. If plaintiff wishes to
amend his complaint, he must include with his motion to amend a proposed complaint that includes
each and every claim he wishes to bring against every defendant in this action. Plaintiff is warned
that the filing of an amended complaint replaces the original complaint, and claims that are not
realleged are deemed abandoned. E.g., In re Wireless Telephone Federal Cost Recovery Fees
Litigation, 396 F.3d 922, 928 (8th Cir. 2005).
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend [31] is DENIED
without prejudice.

Dated this 21st day of August, 2012.

JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-