Amsinger v. Munchnick et al
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Thomas I. Amsingers motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 21]. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/13/2013. (KSM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
THOMAS I. AMSINGER,
STEVE MUNCHNICK, et al.,
No. 4:12-CV-906 CAS
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Thomas I. Amsinger’s motion for partial
summary judgment. Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, has failed to comply with the provisions
District Local Rule 4.01(A), which requires a supportive memorandum. Local Rule 4.01(E)
additionally requires that a statement of material facts be submitted in connection with a summary
A memorandum in support of a motion for summary judgment shall have
attached a statement of uncontroverted material facts, set forth in a separately
numbered paragraph for each fact, indicating whether each fact is established by the
record, and, if so, the appropriate citations. Every memorandum in opposition shall
include a statement of material facts as to which the party contends a genuine issue
exists. Those matters in dispute shall be set forth with specific references to portions
of the record, where available, upon which the opposing party relies. The opposing
party also shall note for all disputed facts the paragraph number from the movant's
listing of facts. All matters set forth in the statement of the movant shall be deemed
admitted for purposes of summary judgment unless specifically controverted by the
See E.D. Mo. L.R. Rule 4.01(E).
Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment does not include a separate or concise
statement of material facts as described under the Local Rules, nor does it have a supportive
memorandum containing citations to relevant case law. As a result of plaintiff’s failure to comply
with the Local Rules of this Court, his motion for partial summary judgment will be denied without
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Thomas I. Amsinger’s motion for partial
summary judgment is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 21]
CHARLES A. SHAW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
day of March, 2013.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?