Amsinger v. Munchnick et al

Filing 25

ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Thomas I. Amsingers motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 21]. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/13/2013. (KSM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION THOMAS I. AMSINGER, Plaintiff, v. STEVE MUNCHNICK, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:12-CV-906 CAS ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Thomas I. Amsinger’s motion for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, has failed to comply with the provisions of Eastern District Local Rule 4.01(A), which requires a supportive memorandum. Local Rule 4.01(E) additionally requires that a statement of material facts be submitted in connection with a summary judgment motion: A memorandum in support of a motion for summary judgment shall have attached a statement of uncontroverted material facts, set forth in a separately numbered paragraph for each fact, indicating whether each fact is established by the record, and, if so, the appropriate citations. Every memorandum in opposition shall include a statement of material facts as to which the party contends a genuine issue exists. Those matters in dispute shall be set forth with specific references to portions of the record, where available, upon which the opposing party relies. The opposing party also shall note for all disputed facts the paragraph number from the movant's listing of facts. All matters set forth in the statement of the movant shall be deemed admitted for purposes of summary judgment unless specifically controverted by the opposing party. See E.D. Mo. L.R. Rule 4.01(E). Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment does not include a separate or concise statement of material facts as described under the Local Rules, nor does it have a supportive memorandum containing citations to relevant case law. As a result of plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Local Rules of this Court, his motion for partial summary judgment will be denied without prejudice. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Thomas I. Amsinger’s motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 21] CHARLES A. SHAW UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 13th day of March, 2013. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?