Seales v. Adams
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 2] is DENIED. An Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 6/1/2012. (KSM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
SOLOMAN SEALES, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
LORETTA ADAMS,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 4:12-CV-0920-AGF
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma
pauperis. Plaintiff, a prisoner, has filed at least three previous cases that were
dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim.1 Under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g), therefore, the Court may not grant the motion unless plaintiff “is under
imminent danger of serious physical injury.”
After reviewing the complaint, the Court finds no allegations that would show
that plaintiff is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. As a result, the Court will
1
See Seales v. Purkett, 99-CV-4050-NKL (W.D. Mo.)(denying plaintiff in forma
pauperis status on the basis of his three-strikes status and dismissing case under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(g)) (citing Seales v. Groose, 95-CV-4187-SOW (W.D. Mo.) ; Seales
v. Moorish Science Temple, Case No. 95-CV-4246-SOW (W.D. Mo.); Seales v.
Groose, No. 96-4053 (W.D.Mo.); Seales v. Groose, No. 96-4232 (W.D.Mo.)); see also
Seals v. Kemna, 98-CV-6153- HFS (W.D. Mo.); Seales v. Kemna, Case No. 98-6157HFS (W.D. Mo.).
deny the motion and will dismiss this action without prejudice to refiling as a fully paid
complaint.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma
pauperis [Doc. 2] is DENIED.
An Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.
Dated this 1st day of June, 2012.
AUDREY G. FLEISSIG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?