Keesee v. Astrue
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the R&R of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF 20) is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Judgment will accompany this Order.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/18/13. (LGK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,1
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Case No. 4:12CV1231 JAR
This matter arises on the August 28, 2013 Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United
States Magistrate Judge David Noce (ECF 20). See 28 U.S.C. § 636. In the R&R, Judge Noce
recommends that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying
Plaintiff Daniel Keesee’s applications for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social
Security Act and Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act.
Plaintiff was granted fourteen days within which to file written objections to the R&R, but to date
has filed no objections.
Upon careful consideration of the R&R and the record in this case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the R&R of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF 20)
is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, AND INCORPORATED herein.
Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013. Pursuant to
Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin is substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the
defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of 42 U.S.C.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and
Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Judgment will accompany
Dated this 18th day of September, 2013.
JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?