Jones v. Astrue
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles 22 , filed June 11, 2013 be and is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER O RDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner denying the plaintiff's application for disability benefits be and is REVERSED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g), this case i s REMANDED to the Commissioner for reconsideration and further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation 22 . This Court does not retain jurisdiction of this case.. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 7/2/13. (cc: Bureau of Hearings and Appeals)(MRS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
LARHONDA JONES, o/b/o D.J., a minor,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN1,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No.4:12CV1456SNLJ/FRB
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
Having received no objections thereto,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles [22], filed June 11, 2013 be and is SUSTAINED,
ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner denying the
plaintiff’s application for disability benefits be and is REVERSED.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to Sentence
Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g), this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for reconsideration and
further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [22]. This
Court does not retain jurisdiction of this case.
1
On February 14, 2013 Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social
Security; thereby, replacing Michael J. Astrue as defendant Commissioner of Social Security.
Dated this
2nd
day of July, 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?