Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Help At Home, Inc.

Filing 41

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff EEOCs request for attorneys fees 39 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall receive attorneys fees in the total amount of $261.60 from Defendant Help at Home. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/20/2013. (RAK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. KARI MCCONNELL, SHANNON SCHROETER & JACLYN STONE, Plaintiff/Intervenors, v. HELP AT HOME, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:12-CV-1498-JAR MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff EEOC’s documentation in support of its request for attorney’s fees and costs associated with its Motion to Compel submitted pursuant to the Court’s May 3, 2013 Order. [ECF No. 39] Plaintiff EEOC’s request is supported by the affidavit of its attorney of record, Barbara A. Seely. (Doc. No. 39-1) Defendant has neither contested the amount of attorney’s fees requested by Plaintiff EEOC nor requested a hearing thereon. In her affidavit, Seely states she spent a total of four hours researching, drafting and filing Plaintiff EEOC’s Motion to Compel Supplementation of Initial Disclosures and Discovery and is paid at the rate of $65.40 per hour. Seely further states the EEOC incurred no expenses in connection with filing its motion to compel. The Court finds the time claimed for attorney’s fees is appropriate and reasonable and will award Plaintiff EEOC its attorney’s fees in the amount of $261.60. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff EEOC’s request for attorney’s fees [39] is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall receive attorney’s fees in the total amount of $261.60 from Defendant Help at Home. JOHN A. ROSS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 20th day of May, 2013. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?