Clark v. Astrue

Filing 20

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation, and hereby sustains, adopts, and incorporates herein the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation 19 in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED t hat, under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff Demetria Clark disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED, with prejudice. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 12/20/2013. (CBL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION

DEMETRIA CLARK,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,1 Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:12CV01560 ERW

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III [ECF No. 19], pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
The Court notes that no objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation within the
time period afforded by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court has considered the Report and
Recommendation, and hereby sustains, adopts, and incorporates herein the Magistrate’s Report and
Recommendation in its entirety. The Social Security Commissioner’s decision denying disability
insurance benefits and supplemental security income is affirmed.

1

Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14,
2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin is
substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the Defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be
taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of the section 205(g) of the Social
Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the final
decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff Demetria Clark disability
insurance benefits and supplemental security income is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is
DISMISSED, with prejudice.
Dated this 20th day of December, 2013.

E. RICHARD WEBBER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE