Harrison v. Wallace

Filing 4

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall return to petitioner his petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner must sign both documents and return them to the Court within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to comply with this Memorandum and Order, the Court will dismiss this action without further proceedings. Response to Court due by 10/30/2012. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/9/2012. (JMC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION KEVIN T. HARRISON, Petitioner, v. IAN WALLACE, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:12CV1787 SNLJ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on petitioner’s submission of a petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner did not sign either of the documents. Under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court must strike an unsigned pleading from the docket unless the party promptly signs the document and returns it to the Court. As a result, the Court will order the Clerk to return both documents to petitioner so that he may sign them. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall return to petitioner his petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner must sign both documents and return them to the Court within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to comply with this Memorandum and Order, the Court will dismiss this action without further proceedings. Dated this 9th day of October, 2012. STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?