Russell v. Bellefontaine Habilitation Center
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to appoint counsel is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. No. 2.]. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 10/16/2012. (KSM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Case No. 4:12CV01849 AGF
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel. Plaintiff
has filed a pro se complaint under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.
§ 2000e-5. There is no constitutional right for a pro se plaintiff to have counsel
appointed in a civil case, although the Court has discretion to appoint an attorney to
handle such a case when necessary. In re Lane, 801 F.2d 1040, 1043-44 (8th Cir. 1986).
Among the factors a court should consider in making this determination are the factual
complexity of the case; the ability of the plaintiff to investigate the facts and present his
claim; the complexity of the legal issues; and to what degree the plaintiff and the court
would benefit from such an appointment. Id.
The Eighth Circuit has identified three additional factors relevant to the
appointment of counsel in Title VII actions: (1) the plaintiff’s financial resources, (2) the
plaintiff's efforts to secure counsel, and (3) the merits of the discrimination claim.
Slaughter v. City of Maplewood, 731 F.2d 587, 590 (8th Cir. 1984).
Upon review of the file and the relevant factors, the Court concludes that
appointment of counsel is not warranted at this time. Should Plaintiff seek the
appointment of counsel at a later stage in the proceedings, he will be required to provide
the Court with a sworn statement itemizing what efforts he has made to obtain legal
counsel, providing the names of attorneys with whom he has discussed representation and
the dates and results of such discussions.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel is
DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. No. 2.]
AUDREY G. FLEISSIG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 16th day of October, 2012.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?