West Coast Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-27

Filing 13

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's Memorandum and Order of November 8, 2012 10 is modified and the motion for appointment of counsel and motion to sever 9 filed by a certain non-party Doe is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER OR DERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike a Certain Non-Party Doe's Motion for Ad Litem Counsel For Defendants 11 is DENIED and the filing shall remain a part of the record. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any further pleadings filed in this matter on behalf of a non-party will be considered by the Court only after a proper motion to intervene has been filed pursuant to Rule 24, Fed.R.Civ.P. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 11/15/12. (LAH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION WEST COAST PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. DOES 1-27, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:12-CV-1874-JAR MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike a Certain Non-Party Doe’s Motion for Ad Litem Counsel For Defendants Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 12(f) [ECF No. 11]. As grounds for the motion, Plaintiff states the motion for ad litem counsel was made by an anonymous John Doe who is neither a party to this action nor an attorney representing any of the 27 Doe defendants in this Court. Moreover, the non-party movant did not follow interventional procedures pursuant to Rule 24, Fed.R.Civ.P. Upon consideration, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’s Memorandum and Order of November 8, 2012 [10] is modified and the motion for appointment of counsel and motion to sever [9] filed by a certain non-party Doe is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike a Certain Non-Party Doe’s Motion for Ad Litem Counsel For Defendants [11] is DENIED and the filing shall remain a part of the record. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any further pleadings filed in this matter on behalf of a non-party will be considered by the Court only after a proper motion to intervene has been filed pursuant to Rule 24, Fed.R.Civ.P. Dated this 15th day of November, 2012. JOHN A. ROSS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?