West Coast Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-27

Filing 28

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Doe 13's pro se Motion to Quash 14 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Does 2, Does 5-20, 22-25 are DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 6/25/13. (LAH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION WEST COAST PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. WARREN WILLIAMS and JEMARD SYKES, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:12-CV-1874 JAR MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On October 15, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Complaint under the Copyright Act against Does 127. (ECF No. 1) On February 19, 2013, Doe 13 filed a letter, which the Court construed as a motion to quash the subpoena. (ECF No. 14) On June 24, 2013, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint, which is now the operative complaint (ECF No. 25) The Amended Complaint is against only two named defendants: Warren Williams (f/k/a Doe 4) and Jemard Sykes (f/k/a Doe 21). As the Amended Complaint supersedes the original Complaint, it appears that Plaintiff is proceeding against only these two named defendants. See In re Atlas Van Lines, Inc., 209 F.3d 1064, 1067 (8th Cir. 2000) (“an amended complaint supersedes an original complaint and renders the original complaint without legal effect”). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Doe 13’s pro se Motion to Quash [14] is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Does 2, Does 5-20, 22-25 are DISMISSED.1 Dated this 25th day of June, 2013. JOHN A. ROSS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 This Court previously dismissed Does 1, 3, 26 and 27. (ECF Nos. 20, 22, 24) -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?