Wingo v. Steele

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 4 MOTION to Consolidate Cases Consolidate with higher case number 4:12cv2073 ERW filed by Petitioner Dwayne J. Wingo motion is GRANTED..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to consolidate [Doc. #4] is GRANT ED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Wingo v. Steele, 4:12CV2073 ERW, isconsolidated into Wingo v. Steele, 4:12CV2072 SNLJ, for remaining briefing. Allfuture pleadings shall be filed as Consolidated Case No. 4:12CV2072 SNLJ, with the consolidated case caption set forth above. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 1/10/13. (MRS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION DWAYNE J. WINGO, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) TROY STEELE, ) ) Respondent. ) ) ________________________________ ) ) DWAYNE J. WINGO ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) TROY STEELE, ) ) Respondent. ) Consolidated Case No. 4:12CV2072 SNLJ Associated Case No. 4:12CV2073 ERW MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court upon petitioner’s motion to consolidate. Petitioner has filed two applications for writ of habeas corpus relating to two convictions relating to the same underlying legal issues and claims. Because the petitions involve common questions of law and fact, the Court finds that the cases should be consolidated under Fed. R. Civ. P. 42 to avoid unnecessary costs and to promote judicial efficiency. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion to consolidate [Doc. #4] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Wingo v. Steele, 4:12CV2073 ERW, is consolidated into Wingo v. Steele, 4:12CV2072 SNLJ, for remaining briefing. All future pleadings shall be filed as Consolidated Case No. 4:12CV2072 SNLJ, with the consolidated case caption set forth above. Dated this 10th day of January, 2013. STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?