Shobe v. Norman
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners Request for More Time 10 is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is granted leave to refile his request with an explanation for his need for additional time and how much additional time he needs. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/3/2013. (RAK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EARL D. SHOBE, JR.,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s Request for More Time. [ECF No. 10] On
November 9, 2012, Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Doc. No. 1) The
Court entered a Case Management Order on November 20, 2012, ordering Respondent to show
cause, in writing and within forty-five (45) days, why the relief requested in the petition should
not be granted. (Doc. No. 6) The Court further ordered Petitioner to file any reply within sixty
(60) days of the date the answer to the petition was filed. (Id.) Respondent filed his Response to
Order to Show Cause on December 17, 2012. (Doc. No. 9) Thus, Petitioner’s reply is due no
later than February 17, 2013. Although Petitioner filed his request for more time on January 2,
2013, he does not provide the Court with an explanation for his need for additional time or how
much additional time he needs. The Court will, therefore, deny Petitioner’s request and grant
him leave to refile.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Request for More Time  is DENIED
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is granted leave to refile his request with
an explanation for his need for additional time and how much additional time he needs.
Dated this 3rd day of January, 2013.
JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?