Shobe v. Norman
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's "Motion of Stay be Re-filed, Ruled on its Merits," 18 , construed as a motion for reconsideration, is DENIED.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 2/18/14. (LGK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
EARL DEAN SHOBE,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFF NORMAN,
Respondent.
No. 4:12-CV-2108-JAR
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s pro se pleading entitled “Motion of Stay be
Re-filed, Ruled on its Merits” (Doc. No. 18), which the Court construes as a motion for
reconsideration of its June 13, 2013 Order denying Petitioner’s motion for stay of habeas corpus.
For the following reasons, Petitioner’s motion will be denied.
The background of this federal habeas action is set forth in detail in the Court’s June 13,
2013 Memorandum and Order. Briefly, Petitioner requested the Court stay his petition in this
action pending the state court’s adjudication of his Rule 91 state habeas petition. The Court ruled
that Petitioner had alleged no unexhausted claim in either this federal habeas action or his state
habeas petition and therefore a stay and abeyance was not appropriate in this case. Petitioner
raises no new arguments in support of his motion that could cause the Court to reconsider its
previous ruling. For the reasons set out in the Court’s June 13, 2013 Memorandum and Order
and incorporated by reference herein, Plaintiff’s motion, construed as a motion for
reconsideration, will be denied.
Further, since the filing of Petitioner’s motion, the Circuit Court of Cole County denied
his state habeas petition and entered judgment in favor of the Respondent. Shobe v. Missouri
1
Board of Probation and Parole, Case No. 12AC-CC00708 (August 26, 2013). Thus, Petitioner’s
motion for stay is moot.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s “Motion of Stay be Re-filed, Ruled on its
Merits,” [18], construed as a motion for reconsideration, is DENIED.
Dated this 18th day of February, 2014.
_____________________________________
JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?