Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. Yovanovitch
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Order to Compel an Accounting 4 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Joseph Yovanovitch, an individual d/b/a/ American Traders, Inc., submit to an audi t for the period March 21, 2011 to date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the failure of Defendant Joseph Yovanovitch, an individual d/b/a/ American Traders, Inc., to comply with this Order may result in sanctions.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/1/13. (LGK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
GREATER ST. LOUIS CONSTRUCTION
LABORERS WELFARE FUND, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
JOSEPH YOVANOVITCH, an individual
d/b/a AMERICAN TRADERS, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:12-CV-2216-JAR
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Order to Compel an
Accounting [ECF No. 4].
Plaintiffs bring this action under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of
1947, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 185, and Section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1132. Plaintiffs seek a default order
of accounting. Thereafter, Plaintiffs will seek a judgment for delinquent contributions and other
amounts Defendant Joseph Yovanovitch d/b/a American Traders, Inc., (“Yovanovitch”) owes to
the Plaintiff Funds. Defendant was served with the summons and complaint on January 14, 2013
and has not entered an appearance or filed any other responsive pleading. On February 19, 2013,
the Clerk’s entry of default was entered [ECF No.7].
Defendant Yovanovitch executed an agreement on March 21, 2011, under the name
American Traders, Inc., agreeing to be bound to a collective bargaining agreement between
Laborers Locals 42-53-110 and the Site Improvement Association, effective from March 1, 2009
through February 28, 2014. The collective bargaining agreement requires employers to make
contributions to the Laborers Benefit Funds on the basis of all hours worked by covered
employees, and requires employers to submit monthly contribution report forms. It further
requires the payment of twenty percent (20%) liquidated damages on delinquent contributions,
as well as interest, attorneys’ fees, and payroll examination costs.
Plaintiffs seek an order compelling Yovanovitch to submit to an audit. Yovanovitch has
not submitted any of the required monthly contribution report forms since he became bound by
the agreement on March 21, 2011. Absent an audit, it will be impossible to determine the
amounts owed by Yovanovitch. The collective bargaining agreement to which Yovanovitch is
bound authorizes Plaintiffs to conduct an audit. In addition, ERISA authorizes this Court to grant
equitable relief such as an accounting in an action for delinquent contributions. See 29 U.S.C. §
1132(g)(2)(E). Moreover, Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides in
relevant part that:
The court may conduct hearings or make referrals-preserving any federal
statutory right to a jury trial-when, to enter or effectuate judgment, it needs to:
(A) conduct an accounting;
(B) determine the amount of damages;
(C) establish the truth of any allegation by evidence; or
(D) investigate any other matter.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Order to Compel an
Accounting [4] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Joseph Yovanovitch, an individual d/b/a/
American Traders, Inc., submit to an audit for the period March 21, 2011 to date.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the failure of Defendant Joseph Yovanovitch, an
individual d/b/a/ American Traders, Inc., to comply with this Order may result in sanctions.
2
Dated this 1st day of March, 2013.
JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?