Sanders v. Astrue

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER--IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. An Order of Dismissal will be filed with this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 01/22/2013. (CLK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ANTHONY SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:12CV2229 JCH MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Court previously ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed as time-barred. Plaintiff has failed to do so. Plaintiff received notice of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security on June 28, 2012. Under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), plaintiff had sixty days from receiving the final notice to file a social security appeal in this Court. In this case, the sixty-day period ended on August 27, 2012. Plaintiff did not submit the instant appeal, however, until November 27, 2012. As a result, the Court will dismiss this action as time-barred. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (in forma pauperis review); Myers v. Vogal, 960 F.2d 750, 751 (8th Cir. 1992) (“Although the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense, a district court may properly dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915[e] when it is apparent the statute of limitations has run.”). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. An Order of Dismissal will be filed with this Memorandum and Order. Dated this 22nd day of January, 2013. /s/Jean C. Hamilton JEAN C. HAMILTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?