Hotop v. St. Louis Police Academy

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis Doc. 2 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel Doc. 4 is DENIED is moot. An Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 12/11/12. (ARL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION TIMOTHY MICHAEL HOTOP, Plaintiff, v. ST. LOUIS POLICE ACADEMY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:12CV2239 RWS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on its own motion. Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states: “If the court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action.” The Court has reviewed the complaint and has determined that it should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff brings this action under state law for breach of contract. Plaintiff alleges that he entered into an implied contract with the St. Louis Police Academy when it accepted his application, i.e., that it agreed to make him a police officer. Plaintiff says when the Academy ultimately decided not to make him a police officer, it breached the implied contract. The Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the complaint. The parties are not diverse. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. And there is no federal question. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. As a result, the Court will dismiss this action under Rule 12(h)(3). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel [Doc. 4] is DENIED is moot. An Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Dated this 11th day of December, 2012. RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?