Stitt v. Astrue
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Baker is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. The Commissioner of Social Securitys decision to deny Supplemental Security Income benefits to Plaintiff is affirmed. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 2/21/14. (JWJ)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
JAMIE DARYN STITT,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Cause No. 4:12 CV 2346 RWS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before me on a Report and Recommendation to affirm the decision of the
Commissioner of Social Security to deny Plaintiff benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social
Security Act. Neither of the parties has filed an objection to this recommendation.
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker for a
Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Judge Baker issued a Report and
Recommendation on February 3, 2014 that recommended that the Commissioner’s decision to
deny benefits should be affirmed. Judge Baker found that the Administrative Law Judge’s
determination that Plaintiff was not entitled to benefits was supported by substantial evidence in
the record.
Any objections to Judge Baker’s Report and Recommendation had to be filed by February
17, 2014. Neither of the parties has filed an objection as of today’s date.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge Baker is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. The
Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny Supplemental Security Income benefits to
Plaintiff is affirmed.
_________________________________
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 21st day of February, 2014.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?