Hill v. Davis et al

Filing 4

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. [Doc. 2] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $13.73 within thirt y (30) days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4 ) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file a written suppl ement to his complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, in accordance with the specific instructions set forth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's failure to supplement his complaint in accordance with this Court's instructions will result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice to him. (Response to Court due by 4/5/2013.) Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/5/2013. (KSM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
TERRAN C. HILL,
Plaintiff,
v.
LARRY DAVIS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:12-CV-2374 CAS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon the application of Terran C. Hill (registration no. 8845)
for leave to commence this action without payment of the required filing fee. For the reasons stated
below, the Court finds that plaintiff does not have sufficient funds to pay the entire filing fee, and
therefore, the motion will be granted, and plaintiff will be assessed an initial partial filing fee. See
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Furthermore, the Court will instruct plaintiff to file an amended complaint
in accordance with the instructions set forth below.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) a prisoner bringing a civil action in forma pauperis is
required to pay the full amount of the filing fee. If the prisoner has insufficient funds in his prison
account to pay the entire fee, the Court must assess and, when funds exist, collect an initial partial
filing fee of 20 percent of the greater of (1) the average monthly deposits in the prisoner's account;
or (2) the average monthly balance in the prisoner's account for the prior six-month period. See 28
U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner is required to make
monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account.

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of the prisoner will forward these monthly
payments to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the prisoner's account exceeds $10, until the
filing fee is fully paid. Id.
Plaintiff has submitted an affidavit and a certified copy of his prison account statement for
the six-month period immediately preceding the submission of his complaint. See 28 U.S.C. §
1915(a)(1),(2). A review of plaintiff's account statement indicates an average monthly deposit of
$68.67, and an average monthly account balance of $35.86. Plaintiff has insufficient funds to pay
the entire filing fee. Accordingly, the Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of $13.73, which
is 20 percent of plaintiff's average monthly balance.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court may dismiss a complaint filed in forma
pauperis at any time if the action is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief can
be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. An action
is frivolous if "it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact." Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319,
325 (1989). An action fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted if it does not plead
“enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,
127 S. Ct. 1955, 1974 (2007).
In reviewing a pro se complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court must give the complaint
the benefit of a liberal construction. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). The Court must
also weigh all factual allegations in favor of the plaintiff, unless the facts alleged are clearly
baseless. Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S. Ct. 1728, 1733 (1992).

2

The Complaint
Plaintiff, an inmate at the St. Louis City Justice Center, seeks monetary relief in this 42
U.S.C. § 1983 action against St. Louis Police Department employees Larry Davis, Michael Kegel,
Craig Robertson, and Kenneth Allen. Plaintiff alleges that defendants falsely arrested him on
December 15, 2011.
The Court has reviewed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) and believes that, although
plaintiff may be able to assert a claim based upon the denial of his Constitutional rights, he has failed
to state a claim upon which relief may be granted at this time, because the complaint is silent as to
whether he is suing the named defendants in their official and/or individual capacities.1
Taking into consideration the fact that plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis,
the Court will instruct plaintiff to file a written supplement to his complaint, in which he states the
capacity (i.e., official capacity, individual capacity, or both individual and official capacities) in
which he is suing each of the named defendants. Moreover, because the Court is allowing plaintiff
to supplement his complaint, it will take no action as to the named defendants at this time. Plaintiff
is advised that he must sign the supplement to the complaint.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
is GRANTED. [Doc. 2]
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $13.73
within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance

1

"[N]either a State nor its officials acting in their official capacity are 'persons' under §
1983." See Will v. Michigan Dep't of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71 (1989).
3

payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison
registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to
issue upon the complaint at this time.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file a written supplement to his complaint
within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, in accordance with the specific instructions set
forth above.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's failure to supplement his complaint in
accordance with this Court's instructions will result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice
and without further notice to him.

_________________________________
CHARLES A. SHAW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 5th day of March, 2013.

4