Vision Films, Inc. v. Does 1-30

Filing 13

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pro se objections filed by John Doe defendants [10 and 11] are denied as set out above.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 6/11/13. (LGK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION VISION FILMS, INC, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. DOES 1-30, Defendants. Case No. 4:13CV20 RWS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before me on two pro se motions objecting to the disclosure of the personal information of Does 4 and 19 in this case. Plaintiffs are entitled to identifying information about these two Doe defendants, so the objections will be overruled. However, plaintiff shall not disclose these (or any other) Does’ identities in any court filings absent further order of this Court. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pro se objections filed by John Doe defendants [#10 and #11] are denied as set out above. RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 11th day of June, 2013.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?