Vision Films, Inc. v. Does 1-30
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pro se objections filed by John Doe defendants [10 and 11] are denied as set out above.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 6/11/13. (LGK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
VISION FILMS, INC,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
DOES 1-30,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:13CV20 RWS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before me on two pro se motions objecting to the disclosure of the personal
information of Does 4 and 19 in this case. Plaintiffs are entitled to identifying information about
these two Doe defendants, so the objections will be overruled. However, plaintiff shall not
disclose these (or any other) Does’ identities in any court filings absent further order of this
Court.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pro se objections filed by John Doe defendants
[#10 and #11] are denied as set out above.
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 11th day of June, 2013.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?