Charron v. Armontrout

Filing 2

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Kenneth G. Charron, Sr. motion is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 3/22/13. (LGK)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
KENNETH G CHARRON, SR.,
Petitioner,
v.
BILL ARMONTROUT,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:13CV508 RWS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before me on petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment under
Rule 60(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Petitioner seeks to reverse the
judgment of his 1990 federal habeas petition, Charron v. Armontrout, 4:90CV2185
GFG (E.D. Mo.). Petitioner claims that respondent committed fraud upon the Court
because the Assistant Attorney General withheld documents from the Court and lied
to the Court when the case was presented to the Court for ruling.
Pursuant to Rule 60(c)(1), “A motion under Rule 60(b) must be made within
a reasonable time--and for reasons (1), (2), and (3) no more than a year after the entry
of the judgment or order or the date of the proceeding.” This cause of action under
Rule 60(b)(3) comes more than one year after the Court entered judgment against
petitioner. As a result, it is untimely.
Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment
[Doc. 1] is DENIED.
Dated this 22nd day of March, 2013.

RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-