Patterson v. Colvin
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than June 30, 2014, Defendant shall file a brief in support of the Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 5/28/14. (KJS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
NORVAL W. PATTERSON, III,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 4:13CV551 AGF
(TIA)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court, sua sponte, upon review of the file. The case was referred
to the undersigned for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b). The suit
involves Applications for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act.
On April 16, 2014, the undersigned entered an Order directing Plaintiff to inform the
Court, in writing, whether he intends to pursue his claims based solely on the allegations made in
his Complaint, or whether he wishes to pursue his claims by way of a separate Brief in Support of
Complaint. The record shows that Plaintiff failed to comply with the Order.
On April 30, 2014, the undersigned entered an Order directing Plaintiff to inform the
Court, in writing, whether he intends to pursue his claims based solely on the allegations made in
his Complaint, or whether he wishes to pursue his claims by way of a separate Brief in Support of
Complaint. A review of the Court file shows that, to date, Plaintiff has not filed a brief in support
of his Complaint, or in any other way complied with the Local Rules or previous Order
of this Court. The undersigned construes this to mean that Plaintiff wants to pursue his claims
based solely on the allegations made in his Complaint. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than June 30, 2014, Defendant shall file a brief
in support of the Answer.
/s/Terry I. Adelman
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated this 28th day of May, 2014.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?