Patterson v. Colvin

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than June 30, 2014, Defendant shall file a brief in support of the Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 5/28/14. (KJS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION NORVAL W. PATTERSON, III, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:13CV551 AGF (TIA) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court, sua sponte, upon review of the file. The case was referred to the undersigned for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b). The suit involves Applications for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. On April 16, 2014, the undersigned entered an Order directing Plaintiff to inform the Court, in writing, whether he intends to pursue his claims based solely on the allegations made in his Complaint, or whether he wishes to pursue his claims by way of a separate Brief in Support of Complaint. The record shows that Plaintiff failed to comply with the Order. On April 30, 2014, the undersigned entered an Order directing Plaintiff to inform the Court, in writing, whether he intends to pursue his claims based solely on the allegations made in his Complaint, or whether he wishes to pursue his claims by way of a separate Brief in Support of Complaint. A review of the Court file shows that, to date, Plaintiff has not filed a brief in support of his Complaint, or in any other way complied with the Local Rules or previous Order of this Court. The undersigned construes this to mean that Plaintiff wants to pursue his claims based solely on the allegations made in his Complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than June 30, 2014, Defendant shall file a brief in support of the Answer. /s/Terry I. Adelman UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated this 28th day of May, 2014. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?