Patterson v. Colvin

Filing 20

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 08/01/2014. (NEB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION NORVAL W. PATTERSON, III, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:13CV551AGF (TIA) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman, to whom this matter was referred for recommended disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On July 11, 2014, Magistrate Judge Adelman filed his Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Court affirm the decision of the Administrative Law Judge to deny Plaintiff disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Neither party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has expired. Upon careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case, the Court concurs with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that the Administrative Law Judge’s decision in this matter should be affirmed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED. A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. _______________________________ AUDREY G. FLEISSIG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 1st day of August, 2014. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?