Carroll v. Colvin

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated August 22, 2014 16 is adopted in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and the case is remanded to the Commission er pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration of plaintiff's claims consistent with the Report and Recommendation as adopted herein. A separate judgment in accord with this Memorandum and Order is entered this date.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 9/10/14. (LGK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION STEVEN CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:13CV830 RWS ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah for a report and recommendation on all dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On August 22, 2014, Judge Mensah filed her Report and Recommendation that the decision of the Commissioner should be reversed and this case remanded for further proceedings under Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. After careful consideration, I will adopt and sustain the thorough reasoning of Judge Mensah Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated August 22, 2014 [#16] is adopted in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and the case is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration of plaintiff’s claims consistent with the Report and Recommendation as adopted herein. A separate judgment in accord with this Memorandum and Order is entered this date. _______________________________ RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 10th day of September, 2014. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?