Jones v. Social Security Administration
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah [#20] is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sentence-four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 9/25/14. (JWD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
CHARLITA K. JONES,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:13 CV 1007 RWS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Charlita K. Jones’ appeal from an adverse ruling of the
Social Security Administration. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this matter was referred to
United States Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah who filed her Report and Recommendation on
August 29, 2014. Judge Mensah recommended that the Commissioner’s decision to deny
benefits should be reversed and that this case should be remanded for further proceedings.
Any objections to Judge Mensah’s Report and Recommendation had to be filed by
September 12, 2014. Neither of the parties has filed an objection as of today’s date.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah [#20] is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND
INCORPORATED herein.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sentence-four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the
decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further
proceedings in accordance with the Report and Recommendation.
_________________________________
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 25th day of September, 2014.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?