Anzaldua v. Northeast Ambulance and Fire Protection District et al

Filing 42

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Defer Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, to Lift Discovery Stay and Amend Case Management Order [ECF No. 40 ] is GRANTED. Defendants' Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Defer Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed no later than January 6, 2014.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motio n to Extend Time to File a Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File First-Amended Complaint [ECF No. 41 ] is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First-Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than January 8, 2014. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on December 31, 2013. (BRP)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION

STEVON ANZALDUA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
NORTHEAST AMBULANCE and
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, et al.
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:13CV01257 ERW

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on a “Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Defer Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the
Alternative, to Lift Discovery Stay and Amend Case Management Order,” filed by defendants
Derek Mays, Robert Lee, and Kenneth Farwell (collectively referred to as “Defendants”) [ECF
No. 40], and on “Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time to File a Reply Memorandum in Support of
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First-Amended Complaint” [ECF No. 41].
Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, and considered the arguments, the Court shall
grant the parties’ motions for extension of time to file their responsive pleadings.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ “Motion for Extension of Time to File
Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Defer Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the
Alternative, to Lift Discovery Stay and Amend Case Management Order” [ECF No. 40] is
GRANTED. Defendants’ Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Defer Motion for
Summary Judgment shall be filed no later than January 6, 2014.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time to File a Reply
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First-Amended Complaint”
[ECF No. 41] is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion
for Leave to File First-Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than January 8, 2014.
Dated this

31st

day of December, 2013.

E. RICHARD WEBBER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION

STEVON ANZALDUA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
NORTHEAST AMBULANCE and
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, et al.
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:13CV01257 ERW

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on a “Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Defer Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the
Alternative, to Lift Discovery Stay and Amend Case Management Order,” filed by defendants
Derek Mays, Robert Lee, and Kenneth Farwell (collectively referred to as “Defendants”) [ECF
No. 40], and on “Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time to File a Reply Memorandum in Support of
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First-Amended Complaint” [ECF No. 41].
Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, and considered the arguments, the Court shall
grant the parties’ motions for extension of time to file their responsive pleadings.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ “Motion for Extension of Time to File
Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Defer Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the
Alternative, to Lift Discovery Stay and Amend Case Management Order” [ECF No. 40] is
GRANTED. Defendants’ Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Defer Motion for
Summary Judgment shall be filed no later than January 6, 2014.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time to File a Reply
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First-Amended Complaint”
[ECF No. 41] is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion
for Leave to File First-Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than January 8, 2014.
Dated this

31st

day of December, 2013.

E. RICHARD WEBBER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2