Baca v. Colvin

Filing 25

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman 24 is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, p ursuant to sentence-four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 9/15/14. (JWD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CANDACE N. BACA, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:13 CV 1562 RWS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Candace Baca’s appeal from an adverse ruling of the Social Security Administration. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman who filed his Report and Recommendation on August 27, 2014. Judge Adelman recommended that the Commissioner’s decision to deny benefits should be reversed and that this case should be remanded for further proceedings. Any objections to Judge Adelman’s Report and Recommendation had to be filed by September 10, 2014. Neither of the parties has filed an objection as of today’s date. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman [#24] is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sentence-four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. _________________________________ RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 15th day of September, 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?