Ewing v. Russell
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 1 ORDERED that the Clerk shall return the petition and its exhibits to petitioner. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall redact the names of any children in the petition and exhibits and replace the name(s) with the child(s) initials. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner has twenty-eight (28) days to comply with this Order. Should petitioner fail to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without further proceedings. Response to Court due by 10/10/2013. (petition returned to petitioner with copy of this order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 9/11/13. (CEL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
BYRON EWING,
Petitioner,
v.
TERRY RUSSELL,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 4:13CV1757 NAB
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon its own motion. The petition and exhibits
contain the full name of a minor child victim. Local Rule 5-2.17(A)(2) requires that
the names of minor children be redacted from any filing with the Court. “Only the
initials of minor children may be listed.” Id. As a result, the Court will direct the
Clerk to return these documents to petitioner so that he can redact the child’s name
from them and replace it with the child’s initials.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall return the petition and its
exhibits to petitioner.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall redact the names of any
children in the petition and exhibits and replace the name(s) with the child(s) initials.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner has twenty-eight (28) days to
comply with this Order. Should petitioner fail to comply with this Order, the Court
will dismiss this action without further proceedings.
Dated this 11th day of September, 2013.
/s/ Nannette A. Baker
NANNETTE A. BAKER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?