Warren v. Federal Government

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. # 2 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice. A separate Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on October 21, 2013. (BRP)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
REV. CALVIN WARREN,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:13-CV-1996-CDP

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Over the past ten weeks, plaintiff has filed numerous delusional and frivolous
cases in this Court regarding a religiously-motivated conspiracy against his family.1
Plaintiff alleges that the government is “using racism, and terrorism, and satanism against
[him]” and is trying to rape and murder his family because they are “Christians and
preachers of the gospel.”
The Court previously warned plaintiff that it would not allow him to proceed in
forma pauperis if he continued to bring the same frivolous lawsuits again and again.
1

See Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1465-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren
v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1560-RWS (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t,
No. 4:13-CV-1570-JAR (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1634HEA (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1643-AGF (E.D. Mo.
2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1780-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v.
Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1878-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No.
4:13-CV-1906-TIA (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1998SNLJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2069-SPM (E.D. Mo.
2013).

Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-1878-CEJ (E.D. Mo.). This case is no different from
his previous cases. Consequently, the Court will deny plaintiff’s motion for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss this action without prejudice to refiling as a
fully-paid complaint. See In re Tyler, 839 F.2d 1290, 1292 (8th Cir. 1988) (“Judicial
resources are limited in the short run and need to be protected from wasteful
consumption. Frivolous, bad faith claims consume a significant amount of judicial
resources, diverting the time and energy of the judiciary away from processing good
faith claims.”).
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis [Doc. # 2] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without
prejudice.
A separate Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously.
Dated this 21st day of October, 2013.

CATHERINE D. PERRY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-