Warren v. Federal Government
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. An Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/10/2013. (JMC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
REV. CALVIN WARREN,
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, et al.,
No. 4:13CV1998 SNLJ
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Plaintiff has filed several delusional and frivolous cases in this Court regarding
a religiously motivated conspiracy against his family. The Court previously warned
plaintiff that it would not allow him to proceed in forma pauperis if he continued to
bring the same frivolous lawsuits again and again. Warren v. Federal Government,
4:13CV1878 CEJ (E.D. Mo.). This case is no different from his previous cases.
Plaintiff alleges that the government is “Satan possessed” and is persecuting his
family “because we are saints.” Consequently, the Court will deny plaintiff’s motion
for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss this action without prejudice
to refiling as a fully-paid complaint. See In re Tyler, 839 F.2d 1290, 1292 (8th Cir.
1988) (“judicial resources are limited in the short run and need to be protected from
wasteful consumption. Frivolous, bad faith claims consume a significant amount of
judicial resources, diverting the time and energy of the judiciary away from
processing good faith claims.”).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without
An Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously.
Dated this 10th day of October, 2013.
STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?