Mark Andy, Inc. v. Heat Technologies, Inc.

Filing 24

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. This matter is before me on defendants' motion to transfer this case to the Northern District of Georgia. On January 10, 2014, plaintiff filed a memorandum notifying the Court that the Georgia case has been settled. Defend ants argued that this case should be transferred to Georgia because of this prior pending action. Now that it has settled, it appears that defendants' motion to transfer is moot. I would like defendants to file a memorandum either notifying the Court that the motion to transfer is now moot or explaining why they are still seeking transfer despite the settlement of the Georgia action. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants shall file a memorandum in compliance with this Memorandum and Order by January 16, 2014. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 01/14/2014. (CBL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MARK ANDY, INC., Plaintiff, v. HEAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:13CV2150 CDP MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before me on defendants’ motion to transfer this case to the Northern District of Georgia. On January 10, 2014, plaintiff filed a memorandum notifying the Court that the Georgia case has been settled. Defendants argued that this case should be transferred to Georgia because of this prior pending action. Now that it has settled, it appears that defendants’ motion to transfer is moot. I would like defendants to file a memorandum either notifying the Court that the motion to transfer is now moot or explaining why they are still seeking transfer despite the settlement of the Georgia action. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants shall file a memorandum in compliance with this Memorandum and Order by January 16, 2014. CATHERINE D. PERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 14th day of January, 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?