Jones v. Cassady

Filing 5

OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 1 ORDERED that the Clerk shall administratively terminate this case. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the petition for writ of habeas corpus as a motion for leave to file an amended petition in Jones v. Bernsen, 4:12CV343 HEA (E.D. Mo.). Case Termed. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 11/25/13. (CEL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM JONES, Petitioner, v. JAY CASSADY, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:13CV2278 HEA OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on review of petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition is duplicative of a another petition that is pending before the Court. Petitioner filed his original petition for writ of habeas corpus on December 16, 2011. Jones v. Bernsen, 4:12CV343 HEA (E.D. Mo.). He challenges a conviction for assault. Petitioner filed the instant petition, which challenges the same judgment, on October 3, 2013, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. That Court transferred the case to this Court on November 13, 2013. In general, when a petitioner files a duplicative habeas petition before adjudication of an initial petition is complete, the Court should construe the second petition as a motion to amend the first petition. E.g., Whab v. United States, 408 F.3d 116, 119 (2d Cir. 2005). As a result, the Court will administratively terminate the instant case and will order the Clerk to file the petition as a motion for leave to amend in the original case. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall administratively terminate this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the petition for writ of habeas corpus as a motion for leave to file an amended petition in Jones v. Bernsen, 4:12CV343 HEA (E.D. Mo.). Dated this 25th day of November, 2013. HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?